Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
There were 46 final peer-reviewed papers included in the review (Table 1).
Thus, 29 peer-reviewed papers were included in our review (Table 1).
A total of 25 peer-reviewed research publications met our criteria and were included in this review (Table I).
(Wait, excuse me — the personal servant I just hired has totally screwed up the way he is laying out the "gold ingots" on my "good review table"!
In total, 380 patients were included in the review (Table 2).
Overall, 17 studies met all the inclusion criteria for this review (Table 1).
Overall, 12 papers and a total of 319 patients were included in this review (Table 1).
All data and articles supporting the conclusions of this systematic review are included within the systematic review (Table 2).
For the HS molecular models considered in this review, Table 1 reports the corresponding chemical formula and molecular weight.
This left us with 20 non-anatomical articles and 6 case reports to analyze for the review (Table 1).
Finally, 111 reports were included in this review (Table 2) [1, 3 13, 16 109, 121] (V Rakhshan, unpublished work).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com