"review steps" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to examining something or assessing a set of actions. For example, "We need to review steps to ensure we are making progress."
According to the proxy document, with competition intensifying, the Hewlett-Packard board began in 1999 to review steps it might take "to secure H.P.'s future by strengthening H.P.'s product and service offerings".
In a statement to the Bali Process ministerial meeting last week, Nauru's justice minister, David Adeang, defended the detention and processing system in place: "We consider [the refugee determination system] to be world-class, incorporating all the elements which are recommended by UNHCR, including a sound legislative base, legal advice for asylum seekers, and merits and judicial review steps".
We briefly review steps to estimate GAM here.
In this review, steps involved in the engineering of zinc finger protein transcription factors are described.
Therefore, our objective is to review steps for delineating a managed land base as a foundation for reporting GHG emissions associated with land use and land-use change.
We provide background that illustrates the key role played by the intermediate discrete dislocation size scale and review steps that have been taken to permit direct size scale coupling.
Table 1 Summary of database review – 578 alcohol studies Review step Results of data extraction 1.
Here we review, step-by-step, from molecules to tissues, how the rules that govern assembly have been identified.
The review step should include: ◦ The analysis of the translatability of each part of the source text (i.e., title, instructions, items, and response options) according to specific review criteria (described below) to identify problematic issues.
The inclusion of a readability assessment (grade or reading level) in the review step raised a lot of discussion and comments from TCA-SIG members, i.e., how to do it, who should do it, etc.
For the second review step, all instruments identified in the first step were anonymized, and the original items were independently reviewed by two reviewers (WM and VG).
