Sentence examples for review science from inspiring English sources

But there's one big difference: The ED money is distributed to states as block grants rather than by peer review (Science, 11 January 2002, p. 265).

Concerns include the extended length of the postdoctoral period; the level of stipends or salaries and benefits paid; whether postdocs will be able to succeed on the academic track, or whether other career options--full-time teaching, science writing, science administration and peer review, science policy, industry--are viable and ought to be considered.

In 2008, the river's Water Management District undertook a Water Supply Impact Study of the proposed water withdrawals and asked the National Research Council to review science aspects of the study as it progressed.

This study confirms that the OA advantage is a statistically significant, independent positive increase in citations, even when we control the independent contributions of many other salient variables (article age, journal impact factor, number of authors, number of pages, number of references cited, Review, Science, USA author).

In a place where, in the Gulf you have huge amounts of oil coming both naturally into the system and through spills and a huge amount of general environmental degradation, it's really hard to establish, "O.K., is this a result of the BP event or not?" And so trying to stick to the peer-review science, I think, is going to be a challenge for the media and for the public as we go along.

She either was not briefed very well or she had not been briefed at all, because her statement runs at odds with the peer reviewed science.

Although reviewing science is an integral part of knowledge generation, we should not allow the critique to paralyse emerging science on climate change from reaching society – especially when the lives and livelihoods of considerable numbers of people are at risk.

The projected speed of glacier melt in the Himalayas has been disputed since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) erroneously reported non-peer reviewed science in 2009 which suggested that glaciers there were likely to disappear altogether by 2035.

This was accepted in October 2005 and resulted in a reviewed science curriculum for secondary school (Frazzetto 2004 Allgaier and Holliman 2006 Castellacci 2006 Pievani 2006 Pievani

Other components of the proposed reforms include prompt publication of minutes and decisions, the acceptance only of properly reviewed science, and more involvement for non-governmental organisations.

"The Northeast Wolf Coalition is working together using the most current peer reviewed science to raise awareness and increase public understanding about wolves.