Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
review of texts
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"review of texts" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you need to refer to the examination of a collection of texts. For example: Our literary analysis included a review of texts from diverse authors.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Data collection included review of text documents and conducting 11 interviews.
In this chapter, we present a review of text compression algorithms, with particular emphasis on the LZ family algorithms, and present our current research on the family of Star compression algorithms.
Science
The problem of opinion fraud detection has been addressed by focusing on the review of text information [10, 31], and by behavioral approaches that utilize the behavior of fake users [18, 19, 24].
Science
Review of text samples taken from these AD forms affirms this wide variability (Table 2).
Science
Computerized text-parsing tools such as LSA allow an objective review of text responses that would be otherwise impossible to standardize.
We sought systematic reviews of text messaging interventions in preventive or curative health care.
Science
Following a screening of the titles and abstracts, the decision about inclusion/exclusion will be based on the review of full texts and made independently by two reviewers.
Science
(During the early 1680s he undertook a critical review of classical texts in geometry, a review that reduced his view of the importance of symbolic mathematics).
Science
Screening of 5780 titles and abstracts left 450 articles for review of full texts.
Science
Reasons for exclusion of articles based on the review of full texts (24– 45) are given in Web Table 2.
Science
The two independent reviews will be compared and contradictory judgments or 'pending' will be temporarily 'included', and moved to the next phase of review of full texts.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "review of texts" in academic writing, clearly define the scope and criteria of your review to provide context for your analysis.
Common error
Avoid using "review of texts" without specifying which texts are being reviewed. Provide specific titles, authors, or thematic groupings to avoid ambiguity.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "review of texts" functions as a noun phrase that describes the act of examining and assessing written material. As Ludwig AI explains, it's a correct and usable phrase, often found in academic contexts.
Frequent in
Science
80%
News & Media
10%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Wiki
1%
Social Media
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "review of texts" is a grammatically correct noun phrase used to describe the act of critically evaluating written materials. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is suitable for formal contexts such as academic and scientific writing. While the phrase isn't extremely common, it's consistently used in appropriate contexts. Alternative phrases, such as "examination of writings" or "assessment of documents", can be used to add variety to your writing. When using the phrase "review of texts", it's best practice to clearly define the scope to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
examination of writings
Replaces "review" with "examination" and "texts" with "writings", providing a slightly more formal tone.
assessment of documents
Substitutes "review" with "assessment" and "texts" with "documents", suitable for formal or professional settings.
analysis of text
Emphasizes a detailed breakdown and interpretation rather than a general overview.
scrutiny of text
Suggests a careful and critical examination, implying a search for errors or inconsistencies.
evaluation of literary works
Specifically refers to the assessment of literature, adding a layer of artistic judgment.
critique of written materials
Implies a formal evaluation, often with the purpose of identifying strengths and weaknesses.
inspection of textual data
Suitable for contexts involving data analysis and information retrieval.
overview of textual content
Focuses on providing a summary or outline rather than an in-depth analysis.
study of literary pieces
Similar to "evaluation of literary works" but focuses on understanding rather than judging.
reading of scholarly articles
Specifically refers to the act of reading and understanding academic texts.
FAQs
How can I use "review of texts" in a sentence?
You can use "review of texts" to describe the process of critically examining written works. For example, "Our project involved a comprehensive "review of texts" from various philosophical perspectives."
What is a synonym for "review of texts"?
Similar phrases include "examination of writings", "assessment of documents", or "analysis of text", depending on the specific context.
Is "review of texts" formal or informal language?
"Review of texts" is generally considered formal and appropriate for academic, professional, and scientific contexts.
How does a "review of texts" differ from a summary?
A "review of texts" involves critical analysis and evaluation, whereas a summary simply provides a condensed version of the content.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested