review of documents

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "review of documents" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where an examination or assessment of documents is required, such as in legal, academic, or business settings. Example: "The committee conducted a thorough review of documents related to the project before making their final decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

But in December, based on interviews and a review of documents, some from Dr. Knudson's file, investigators began to unravel the true Ames story.

The New York Times

"Our review of documents revealed many additional email communications that exhibited racial or ethnic bias, as well as other forms of bias," the report states.

The Guardian

A review of documents from three of the hedge funds managing money for the Rhode Island pension fund show that some investors are more equal than others.

The New York Times

Whatever the substance of the dispute, a review of documents and e-mails provided by both camps shows how tensions have spread.

The New York Times

She also presented a PowerPoint review of documents — essentially a preview of the defense she will offer at her ethics trial.

The New York Times

The vice chairman of the Senate intelligence panel, Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, a Democrat of West Virginia, said that "closed hearings and review of documents presented by the administration are not sufficient.

The New York Times

The US has now essentially completed the review of documents taken from Bin Laden's compound, though intelligence analysts will continue to mine the data for a long time, officials have said.

The Guardian

The report, based on a review of documents, e-mail messages, audiotapes and interviews, is critical of Freddie Mac's accounting practices and traces the problems to the mid-1990's, even before the period covered by the company's restatement.

The New York Times

The Times review of documents from all 42 states with lotteries and the District of Columbia found that nearly all have increased payouts and lowered the percentage going to programs.

The New York Times

A1 Energy Industry Influence A review of documents made public this week by the Department of Energy found that several recommendations from energy industry representatives were written into the White House's national energy report and a presidential order.

The New York Times

Still, the benefits afforded to corporations looking to cloak themselves with the authority of think tanks are strikingly evident, according to a review of documents from more than a dozen institutions.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "review of documents" in formal writing, ensure the context clearly indicates the purpose of the review. For example, specify whether it's for compliance, analysis, or verification.

Common error

Avoid using "review of documents" in contexts where "review" alone suffices. For instance, instead of saying "a review of documents was conducted", you can simply say "a review was conducted" if it's clear the subject matter is documents.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review of documents" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. It describes the act of examining documents for a specific purpose.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Unknown/unmatched sources

19%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "review of documents" is a grammatically correct and commonly used noun phrase, frequently employed across diverse contexts such as science, news, and business. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and usability. Its purpose is to describe the act of examining documents, often for analysis, verification, or compliance. While the phrase is versatile, it's advisable to avoid redundancy by using simply "review" when the context makes it clear that documents are the subject. For alternatives, consider "document examination" or "assessment of documents" to add nuance. The phrase's prevalence in authoritative sources underscores its reliability and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

document examination

Focuses on the process of examining documents, emphasizing scrutiny and detail.

assessment of documents

Highlights the evaluation aspect, suggesting a judgment or appraisal of the documents' content or quality.

document analysis

Implies a more in-depth and structured examination, often involving specific methodologies.

inspection of documents

Suggests a careful and thorough viewing of the documents, often for verification or compliance purposes.

scrutiny of documents

Emphasizes a critical and detailed examination, often looking for errors or inconsistencies.

document verification

Highlights the process of confirming the accuracy or authenticity of the documents.

analysis of records

Broader term applicable to both physical and digital documents emphasizing a thorough investigation.

evaluation of paperwork

Suggests an assessment of the relevance, accuracy and completeness of documents, with a sense of informality.

records review

Shorter and more concise, useful in contexts where brevity is important.

paperwork assessment

Similar to "assessment of documents" but may imply a focus on administrative or routine documents.

FAQs

How to use "review of documents" in a sentence?

You can use "review of documents" in sentences like: "The investigation involved a thorough review of documents.", "Our team is responsible for the review of documents related to the merger.", or "The auditor performed a review of documents to ensure compliance."

What can I say instead of "review of documents"?

You can use alternatives like "document examination", "assessment of documents", or "document analysis" depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "review of documents" and "examination of documents"?

"Review of documents" generally implies a broader assessment or overview, while "examination of documents" suggests a more detailed and focused scrutiny. The choice depends on the depth and purpose of the analysis.

Is "review of the documents" grammatically different from "review of documents"?

The phrase "review of the documents" is grammatically correct and specific, referring to a particular set of documents. "Review of documents", without "the", is more general and refers to the activity itself or to documents in general. Both are correct but have slightly different meanings.