Sentence examples for review of acceptability from inspiring English sources

As this review of acceptability studies was conducted before all AMC trials results were known, higher levels of acceptability may be expected following the WHO/UNAIDS recommendation [ 9].

A comprehensive review of acceptability studies in sub-Saharan Africa noted that men who were willing to be circumcised considered that MC would not adversely affect sexual pleasure [ 101].

47– 53 As social scientist Martin Holt noted in a review on acceptability literature, much of this early research on acceptability was assessed on the basis of simple single-answer survey questions, such as "If PrEP were at least 80% effective and available, would you use it?", a format that does not allow respondents to consider the pros and cons of PrEP as a strategy.

In a review of 13 acceptability studies of heterosexual men in sub-Saharan Africa, concern about possible pain was "the major barrier" to agreeing to be circumcised [ 101].

Are certain types of self-management support intervention more effective than others in men with LTCs? Results from a parallel qualitative review of the acceptability and accessibility of self-management support interventions in men are reported elsewhere.

A recent systematic review of the acceptability and feasibility of task sharing mental health care with PHC workers in LMICs found that studies were scarce and were often concerned with clearly circumscribed interventions for specific disorders rather than providing a general mental health service [ 18].

Reviews of microbicide acceptability research have emphasized the social-cultural factors [38] and recommended the use of a comprehensive and integrated approach assessing 'vehicle-associated', 'application-associated' and 'use-associated' factors [39].

Digest submissions undergo a limited peer review for acceptability.

Institutional review boards (IRBs) or research ethics committees provide a core protection for human research participants through advance and periodic independent review of the ethical acceptability of proposals for human research.

These will be collated, reviewed internally by CTK research team, and then posted on a wiki site for open, transparent review of their feasibility, acceptability and clinical impact by national clinical experts.

This notion of the heterogeneity of cultures has important implications for institutional review boards that review the acceptability of the conduct of research in heterogeneous communities.