Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
Even if it doesn't come back to the same journal (as it probably won't if you or another reviewer recommend rejection), you might be asked to review it for another journal, and you will want to see that they made an attempt to improve the quality of the work.
Tim will review it for the Science Book Club on Friday 30 September.
If an idea gets 10,000 votes, Lego will review it for possible production.
When customers get in touch with Mr. Wynn, he secures their charge card number and sends them the requested piece so they can review it for 30 days.
Ed Gillespie, chairman of the Republican National Committee, sent CBS a letter last week requesting that associates of Mr. Reagan review it for historical accuracy.
Now watch this Marcus Sedgwick made this fascinating video for us on the hidden numbers of She Is Not Invisible plus why you should read the book and review it for the Guardian young critics award.
Similar(26)
Tim Jonze reviewed it for the Guardian today, praising its "warm, homemade feel".
Referees who have reviewed a paper for another journal might feel that it is unfair to the authors for them to re-review it for Scientific Data.
Reviewing it for The New York Times, Vincent Canby called it "ghastly".
(This week, Dan Piepenbring has reviewed it for this Web site).
Lee Siegel reviewed the biography for the Book Review, Deborah Friedell reviewed it for The London Review of Books, Benjamin Balint reviewed it for Ha'aretz — and I just wrote a long essay on Malamud for the website Nextbook.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com