Sentence examples for review is flawed from inspiring English sources

For if peer review is flawed, and it is, then scientists know there is enough slack in the system that such flaws rarely matter.

Critics have argued that the current system of review is flawed [ 6].

The ABC section secretary for the Community and Public Sector Union, Sinddy Ealy, said an independent Senate inquiry was essential, because the departmental review was flawed.

Pandelis Perakakis, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Castellón in Spain and co-founder of Open Scholar, the UK-registered non-profit company that will run Libre, said that journals used their present 'monopoly' on administering peer review to justify excessively high prices – even though the current model of peer review was flawed by conflicts of interest.

"Will the new positions be budgeted into the project?" Some security consultants said the SAIC review was flawed because it relied in part on a facial recognition system that has failed repeated performance trials.

Brondum seems to miss this point in implying that our review is without value because the studies that evaluated the association between lead and a diagnosis of ADHD, which comprise a relatively small part of our review, are flawed in his opinion.

In 2006, shortly after Dr. Fillmore and her colleagues published a critical analysis saying a vast majority of the alcohol studies they reviewed were flawed, Dr. R. Curtis Ellison, a Boston University physician who has championed the benefits of alcohol, hosted a conference on the subject.

Even reviews are flawed, not least because it's estimated that about a third of online reviews are fake.

Housing advocates, while acknowledging that the foreclosure reviews were flawed, said they don't understand how turning the process over to mortgage companies improves a system already insufficiently independent.

We note that the nearly universal absence of biological criteria for admitting studies into review does not, in itself, prove that such reviews are flawed, but it does raise that possibility.

Professor Swapan Chattopadhyay, director of the Cockroft Institute based at the Daresbury science and innovation campus, which also receives STFC funding, told the committee: "The STFC's peer review process is flawed, so you can't expect anything but flawed recommendations". He said some of the peer review panels don't have adequate "expertise".