Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
The systematic review in this study has some limitations.
We review in this study up-to-date information about expression, role, regulation and clinical relevance of TMPRSS4 in cancer.
After a review of the titles and abstracts 141 articles were retrieved of which 9 met the inclusion criterion for review in this study [ 32- 40].
It is important to note that the majority of tumours (24 out of 28) that have undergone pathology review in this study have been derived from carriers of the PALB2 c.3113G>A mutation.
As a result, we had to make minor modifications of the definitions of Friedman et al [ 5] and did not perform a case-by-case individual chart or patient review in this study.
The process and outcomes of proposal review in this study were based on reviews of two ethics committees at one institute in Thailand; the results may reflect those of research involving minority populations in similar settings, but may not be generalizable to other settings.
Similar(53)
These problems are conceptually reviewed in this study.
Publications comparing the ability of the different phyllosilicates to protect SOC are reviewed in this study.
The problems related to nonlinear dynamics of material processing by cutting are reviewed in this study.
One hundred and forty-six patients who underwent elective revision THR surgery were reviewed in this study.
Section 3 highlights existing digital and cloud forensic process models reviewed in this study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com