review for

USAGE SUMMARY

'review for' is a correct and usable expression in written English.
You can use it to express that someone should review something for a certain purpose, such as "I'm suggesting that you review the report for any errors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(See his review for the definition).

The New York Times - Books

Neurology Review for Psychiatrists.

Harvard University

Read a review for Wool.

The Guardian

§ 503.57 Mandatory review for declassification.

Cornell University

It's called peer review for a reason.

The Guardian

Read our full review for more details.

The Guardian - Tech

Write a review for your school's paper.

The New York Times

The findings are under review for publication.

The New York Times - Science

(Tuesday 10/2) Review for the midterm.

University of California, Berkeley

(Tuesday 11/6) Review for the midterm.

University of California, Berkeley

This is good review for the final.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "review for", clearly state the specific purpose of the review to avoid ambiguity. For example, "review the contract for errors" is more precise than simply "review the contract".

Common error

A common mistake is to use "review for" without specifying what the review is intended to find or address. Always clarify the goal of the review to provide context and direction, i.e., instead of saying "review the document" say "review the document for clarity and accuracy".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review for" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating the purpose or intention behind an examination or assessment. Ludwig examples show its use in various contexts, clarifying what is being sought during the review process. Ludwig AI considers it a correct and usable expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "review for" is a grammatically correct and highly versatile expression used to specify the purpose of an examination or assessment. As demonstrated by Ludwig, it is commonly found in News & Media, Academia, and Science, adapting to both neutral and formal registers. When using "review for", clarity is key; always specify the exact purpose of the review to avoid ambiguity. Common alternatives include "examine in order to", "assess with the aim of", and "check to identify". Ludwig AI confirms that "review for" is a valid and useful phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evaluate for the purpose of

Replaces "review" with "evaluate" and adds "for the purpose of" for emphasis.

examine in order to

Replaces "review" with a more formal synonym and clarifies the purpose with "in order to".

assess with the aim of

Uses "assess" to convey evaluation and specifies the objective with "with the aim of".

check to identify

Emphasizes verification and specifying the target of review.

study in light of

Suggests a careful examination considering new information.

inspect in preparation for

Suggests a thorough examination anticipating something.

screen in order to

Implies a filtering process to identify something specific.

analyze considering

Emphasizes breaking down information and thinking about it.

audit in regards to

Suggests a formal examination.

investigate with respect to

Indicates a detailed inquiry focused on a particular aspect.

FAQs

How to use "review for" in a sentence?

Use "review for" to indicate the purpose of an examination or assessment. For example, "Please "review the report for typos"" shows what the report should be checked for.

What can I say instead of "review for"?

You can use alternatives like "examine in order to", "assess with the aim of", or "check to identify" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "review for errors" or "review of errors"?

"Review for errors" is used to indicate checking something to find errors, while "review of errors" refers to a summary or analysis of existing errors. The correct one depends on your intended meaning.

What's the difference between "review for" and "revise for"?

"Review for" implies looking over something to identify specific issues or aspects, while "revise for" suggests making changes or improvements based on identified issues. For example, you might "review a draft for clarity" and then "revise it for conciseness".