Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
In this paper we review differences and similarities among different developed frameworks and identify some implications for crop modelling.
We review and summarize the most recent results for these technologies and review differences in flow diverter designs.
As discussed in this review, differences in study design and patient characteristics could explain the variation in results.
In the present communication we will review differences between fetal neonatal and adult HSPCs, current progress and limitations in the use of PCB for transplantation, and targeted approaches to overcome these limitations in the clinical use of PCB for treatment of hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic disorders.
For a study to be included in this review differences in measured or calculated strain had to be investigated with regard to: (1) cart weight/ load; (2) handle position and design; (3) exerted forces; (4) handling task (push and pull); or (5) task experience.
Finally, we will review differences in diagnostic errors between false positives and false negatives.
Similar(51)
This paper reviews differences between wind and conventional generations, provides an outline over the scope of grid integration problems and the inherent associations, and discusses thoughts toward potential solutions and relevant areas to be researched.
We have reviewed differences in iron transport systems between the E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 and EAEC 042 and these are summarised in Table S5.
By reviewing differences in minor allele frequency between sensitive and DLC-adapted population pairs, a strong signal was apparent for two SNPs: AHR2_1929 and CYP1A_2140 (Table 7).
Another report reviewed differences in both ocular and systemic safety between intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab in the setting of neovascular AMD.
A recent microarray study reviewed differences in the heat shock response of E. coli O157 H7 EDL933 and K12 strains, and attributed discrepancies to experimental conditions and/or genomic compositions [ 77].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com