Sentence examples for review classification from inspiring English sources

The authors also review classification and clustering approaches.

This paper presents a review, classification schemes, critique, a simple meta-analysis and future research implication of fuel consumption optimization (FCO) literature in the air transport sector.

Given the word class, the method explores textual features using the combination of "Adverb", "Adjective", and "Verb" for the review classification.

While we are analyzing the movie review classification, which has ground truth labels, we will take a moment to further support our claims for the inaccuracy of these methods at the sentence level.

To this end, while previous works mostly focused on individual aspects, this paper develops a comprehensive 'socio-techno-economic' review, classification and analysis of DR barriers and enablers in a Smart Grid context.

Though the two tiered priority review classification system was formalized by Congress in 1992, a previous three tiered classification system grouped drugs into types A (important therapeutic gain), B (modest therapeutic gain), and C (little or no therapeutic gain).

The main purposes of this paper are (i) to review classifications and analyses of the V-DE construction by Li and Thompson (1981), Li (1990), and Huang et al. (2009) and point out their problems and (ii) to offer an alternative classification and analysis and further discuss previous proposals made with respect to this construction.

This paper reviews classification theory sources to develop five research questions concerning factors associated with incident coding system development and use and how these factors affect coding reliability.

This permitted a review of classification error: how many training set samples were incorrectly assigned, and classification performance: the range of probabilities observed ahead of deciding the test priorities for scant case material.

By comparison, the change in the review and classification procedure initiated on May 10 helped shorten the diagnosis-to-classification time for all SARS patients, indicating that the action by the SARS Prevention and Extrication Committee to expedite the review process had indeed worked.

A second important date in SARS prevention and control was May 10, when changes in the review and classification procedures were implemented by the cabinet-level SARS Prevention and Extrication Committee in Taiwan to expedite the review and classification of SARS cases (13 ).