review against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "review against" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used when discussing a comparison or evaluation of something. Example: "The team will conduct a thorough review against the company's financial records to identify any discrepancies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Two reviewers assessed each systematic review against the eligibility criteria and resolved any conflicts through consultation.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Now there's a review against Rogers!

The Guardian - Sport

It might be now, because there's an LBW review against Broad!

The Guardian - Sport

One parent of a pupil at the school has started a judicial review against the DfE in retaliation.

The Guardian

A judicial review against the planning permission that was granted by Trafford Council exactly a year ago has been rejected.

The Guardian - Sport

The E.P.A. has sued 34 plants and taken other enforcement actions under new source review against 20 others.

The New York Times

Updated at 3.28pm GMT 3.24pm GMT REVIEW against Amla Amla survives an LBW appeal after an awesome outswinger from Johnson.

The Guardian - Sport

MediaVest competed in the review against media agencies that included Horizon Media and the PHD division of the Omnicom Group.

The New York Times

"Their business plan is ludicrous," said Michael Ball, director of the Waterloo Community Development Group, who has launched a judicial review against the planning permission.

The Guardian - Arts

If it had been attaining those kind of figures all year, ITV wouldn't be bringing a judicial review against the ITC.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

There Mr. Arnhart was grouped with John Derbyshire, a contributing editor at National Review, against John G. West and George Gilder, who both are associated with the Discovery Institute, which advocates intelligent design.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "review against", clearly define the criteria or standards against which the review is being conducted to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid vagueness by explicitly stating the standards or guidelines used in the "review against". Lack of clarity makes the review subjective and less valuable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review against" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to indicate a process of evaluation or assessment in relation to a set of criteria or standards. As Ludwig AI explains, it is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "review against" is a grammatically correct and frequently used prepositional phrase that signifies a process of evaluation or assessment based on specific criteria. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various writing contexts, particularly in science, news media, and formal business. To enhance clarity, it is essential to explicitly state the standards used during the review. While "review against" enjoys broad applicability, alternatives like "assess in relation to" or "evaluate with respect to" can offer nuanced expressions depending on the context. Overall, "review against" is a valuable phrase when a formal and criteria-based evaluation is required.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assess in relation to

Changes the verb to 'assess' and uses 'in relation to' to emphasize comparison.

evaluate with respect to

Replaces 'review' with 'evaluate' and employs 'with respect to' for a more formal tone.

examine in comparison to

Substitutes 'review' with 'examine' and uses 'in comparison to' to highlight the act of comparing.

check against

A more direct and simple way to express the action of verifying something against something else.

measure against

Emphasizes the act of quantifying or determining the extent of something relative to a standard.

compare with

Focuses solely on the act of comparing, omitting the evaluative aspect of a review.

scrutinize in light of

Suggests a detailed and critical examination considering specific information.

audit with consideration to

Implies a formal inspection and evaluation, especially of financial records, taking something into account.

validate in terms of

Indicates an attempt to prove or confirm the accuracy or soundness of something based on particular criteria.

test in accordance with

Highlights the act of putting something through a procedure to determine its quality or functionality, following established rules.

FAQs

How do I use "review against" in a sentence?

Use "review against" when you want to express the act of assessing something in relation to a specific set of criteria, standards, or guidelines. For example, "The performance was reviewed against the project's objectives".

What's the difference between "review against" and "compare to"?

"Review against" implies a formal evaluation based on established criteria, while "compare to" simply means to examine the similarities and differences between two or more things without necessarily making a judgment.

What are some alternatives to "review against"?

You can use alternatives such as "assess in relation to", "evaluate with respect to", or "examine in comparison to depending on the context".

In what contexts is "review against" most commonly used?

"Review against" is commonly used in professional, academic, and technical contexts, where formal evaluations and assessments are necessary. It is often found in reports, audits, and analyses.