Sentence examples for reversible sentence from inspiring English sources

For instance, left-hemisphere patients asked to match spoken sentences to sets of pictures will correctly match the semantically reversible sentence "The woman pushed the girl" to a picture of a woman pushing a girl.

We detected regions that were selectively activated by reversibility in general, syntactic complexity in general, and by syntactic complexity only within reversible sentences.

The intervention resulted in significant and stable improvement in treated behaviours with increased scores for sentence comprehension, including the comprehension of spoken and written reversible sentences.

The first of these was a sentence-picture matching task using semantically reversible sentences.

In other words, the effect of syntactic complexity was selective for reversible sentences only.

Reversible sentences induced signal changes in several regions that were nearly twice as large as the responses to irreversible sentences.

Reversible sentences (R) involved a human as both subject and object and were constructed to avoid plausibility biases.

This is consistent with the hypothesis that these 2 regions are driven by the increased cognitive demands associated with processing the difficult object-embedded reversible sentences.

Of these 3 regions, the latter 2 proved to be sensitive to the object-embedded versus subject-embedded distinction only within the reversible sentences.

This test, using semantically reversible sentences, provides a standard measure of syntactic impairment that is independent of the other tests of syntactic processing function used with the patients.

Although the posterior areas (middle temporal, superior temporal, and inferior parietal) have greater responses to reversible sentences, there is no additional effect of the challenging RSO structure.