Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Within the four score items, two negatively stated items required reversed coding.
Reversed coding for some items was used.
We reversed coding of several questions for our total score calculation, and scored each item as either 0 (=answered as 'no') or 1 (=answered as 'yes'yes
There were significantly higher unhappiness scores (mean 0.49 vs. 0.23, p =.019) and almost significantly higher obedience scores (mean 1.77 vs. 1.52, reversed coding, p =.068).
Similar(56)
The RAST annotation files were de-constructed into four tracks, forward and reverse coding DNA and RNA.
Negative items were reverse-coded.
The variables and indexes were reverse-coded for the multilevel analyses.
In the present study, the scores were reverse-coded so that a higher value corresponds to a higher response.
For quality of social support, we included items reflecting social support and reverse coded items for social strain for close relationships.
Every other question was reverse-coded.
Items with negative factor loadings were reverse-coded.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com