"reverse progression" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the process of going backward or in reverse order. For example, "Rather than going forward in the process, we had to make a reverse progression and start again from step one."
That probably went over the head of 85percentt of those reading, but now that I got it off my chest, let's look back at our March into April and talk about the difference between reverse progression and regression.
In contrast, given a reverse progression the possibility of identifying this gene pair would be eliminated.
Thus, it is possible that suppression of this cytokine axis within tumours may decrease metastatic potential once cancers are diagnosed, or perhaps reverse progression from dysplasia to carcinoma in high risk patients.
This is based on studies in rats where high methyl-donor diet causes changes to DNA methylation in models of obesity [ 21], while a methyl donor supplementation to a high-fat-high-sucrose diet is able to reverse progression of liver damage [ 22].
Recent studies demonstrate that improvement of anti-tumour immune response by targeting negative regulatory molecules, such as CD25, chronic T-lymphocyte activation antigen 4, and programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1)/PD-1 L, offers a novel opportunity to prevent or even reverse progression of tumour growth in experimental models and patients.
HGF inhibition exacerbates renal fibrosis, whereas HGF supplementation reverses progression [ 8– 11].
The addition of steroids in these patients temporarily reversed progression in 4 of 15 patients [ 32].
The treatment provided by the organization is simple and effective in reversing progression of early stage disease.
Since knee OA is known to progress (Thorstensson et al. 2009), and since the prevalence of knee OA can be expected to increase substantially in the future (Holt et al. 2011), early treatment strategies could be important to reduce the disease burden in the future by preventing (or even reversing) progression of the disease (Hunter 2011).
However, based on a systematic review, Bader et al. (2001) [ 47] concluded that the evidence was insufficient to establish the efficacy of methods (mainly involving the use of fluoride) for arresting or reversing progression of early lesions because of a limited number of studies and lack of adequate statistical testing.
This is what's known as a "reverse-progression", "Martingale strategy" or "double bet strategy".
