Sentence examples for reverse panel from inspiring English sources

Including pictorial warnings only on the reverse panel of packaging has been found to reduce warning effectiveness.

The positioning of images only on the reverse panel of packaging is inconsistent with the Guidelines for Article 11 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control 16 and best international practice.

9 Similarly, lack of rotation is likely to have increased wear-out; although images appeared on the reverse panel of packs in the UK in 2008 to support the warning text, the text has been on packs since 2003.

All Kerrods packs had the same warning on the pack front (smoking kills) and one of three 'pictorial' warnings on the reverse panel showing either a set of healthy and diseased lungs, smoke in a child's face or a text warning about seeking help (see figure 1).

In the UK cigarette packs contain 1 of 2 text health warnings on the front ('Smoking kills' or 'Smoking seriously harms you and others around you') and 1 of 14 'pictorial' warnings on the reverse panel, although 3 are in fact text warnings as they do not display a picture, photo, pictogram or symbol.

Mr. Glazier said the city would ask the entire appeals court to reverse the panel's decision.

The full Sixth Circuit should grant a pending request for a rehearing and reverse the panel's damaging ruling.

However, the Justice Department, in its pending en banc petition asking the Ninth Circuit to reverse the panel's decision, argues "no" -- nothing that the 1984 National Organ Transplant Act actually makes it a felony for cash or its equivalent to be exchanged for an organ, defined to include "bone marrow".

Why has the Wall Street Journal editorial page, hardly a bosom buddy of the Ninth Circuit, weighed in to vigorously support the Flynn decision, joining -- as it says -- a strange bedfellow to rage against the Holder Justice Department's decision to try to reverse the panel?

The full appeals court declined to rehear the case that fall, and the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the panel decision in 2001.

The federal government then sought review by the full appeals court, which in August reversed the panel's decision by a vote of 8too 2. As it made its way through the courts, the case, Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, No. 07-444, was the focus of spirited debates about federal policy, medical ethics and individual freedom.