Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Comparison of the brief advice intervention group with the assessment-only control group revealed odds ratios of 1.6 and 1.9, respectively.
Similar(59)
Logistic regression analysis revealed age (odds ratio = 4.01, P =.002) (95% confidence interval, 1.98-7.44) and hsCRP (odds ratio = 2.58, P =.005) (95% confidence interval, 1.33-5.01) to be associated with greater risk of silent myocardial ischemia.
The same odds ratio calculations, with the equivocal cats added to the group of fHCM negative cats revealed an odds ratio for cats carrying the C allele (c.91C) to be 2.5 (95% Cfi: 1.0; 6.0).
Multivariable regression analyses revealed higher odds of enterobiasis in children of all age-groups with a reported anthelminthic treatment history over the past six months (odds ratio (OR): 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 - 3.79) and in SAC with a higher temperature (OR: 2.21; CI: 1.13 - 4.33).
Separate analyses in females and males revealed similar odds ratios in allele frequency comparisons but slightly higher significance levels in males (Table 6) than in females (Table 7).
Using 10 studies of Asian populations, their results revealed an odds ratio of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.79).
Sex and age-specific analyses revealed that odds of ID, IDA, and abnormal iron indicators were highest in adolescent females.
Multiple logistic regression model for induced abortion revealed higher odds with increasing age of the mother (Table 3).
This association remained statistically significant and revealed an odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.020 1.006-1.04 1.006-1.04 when controlling for p=0.01ial confounders in a multiple logistic regression.
The regression analysis revealed an odds ratio for TKR of 1.65 (1.24-2.2) p = 0.0007, in the type 3 finger pattern group compared with the rest of the study group.
The regression analysis revealed an odds ratio for total knee replacements of 1.65 (1.24-2.2) p = 0.0007, in the type 3 finger pattern group, similar in both genders.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com