Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Compared with I/R group, LSTS treatments revealed comparable amount of CAT.
Interestingly, confocal microscopy revealed comparable time-dependent uptake of EGFP-labeled CROP domain (EGFP-TcdA1875 2710) EGFP-TcdA1875 2710ength Tcompared
The model validation revealed comparable results as the model calibration for both crops (Tables 2, 3).
However, both groups revealed comparable PD reductions and only minor improvements in mean BOP scores [55].
Competitive binding and treatment assays revealed comparable biologic properties for F-SKI249380 and the parent drug.
Mercury porosimetery revealed comparable (F = 0.057, P < 0.92) average pore diameter (85 ± 24 μm) for all the prepared scaffolds.
PMB and Organoclay 1 revealed comparable results and suggest a Langmuir isotherm, whereas Bentonite 1 indicated a linear isotherm.
Thermal properties of the polyamides 52 57 are collected in Table 6 and the results revealed comparable thermal stability.
In addition, the comparison between σ10 and σ60 curves revealed comparable behavior in the various territorial units.
Furthermore, uptake of nanoparticles functionalized with or without pullulan prepared with polymers of different hydrophobic character revealed comparable uptake.
Conclusion: The binding affinity of SNAP-7941 and the (S -enantiomer revealed comparable reS -enantiomern a low nanomolarevealed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com