Suggestions(1)
Similar(60)
In one case, scanning revealed a lethal stroke that dissection missed.All this suggests that scans might play a useful role in determining causes of death.
A recent pacemaker study revealed an increased stroke risk in patients with device-detected silent AF.
The exclusion criteria were that a stroke could not be verified in the medical records, or that the medical records revealed a history of stroke also before the BC diagnosis.
Grouped in 10-year increments, the adjusted hazard ratio for primary outcomes (all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) revealed a J-shape relationship between treatment SBP and DBP.
12 Another analysis of this cohort revealed a risk for ischaemic stroke, where every 5 years of rotating shift work was associated with 4% increased risk (HR=1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07).
Analysis of infarct volume at 24 h post-stroke and of neuronal density at 28 day post-stroke revealed a similar extent of brain injury in both groups.
Similar to the findings observed in patients suffering AMI, a characterization study of human monocyte mobilization in the days following a stroke revealed an expansion of intermediate monocytes by day 2, while the classical monocyte population was unperturbed [56].
The prehospital neurological status by the stroke physician revealed a severe dysarthria, a left-sided facial paresis and a paresis of the left upper (grade 2/5) and lower (grade 3/5) extremities (NIHSS 7, Rankin 4, Barthel 50).
Hong Kong stroke survivors revealed a high level of community integration as measured by the CIM-C (mean (SD): 43.48 (5.79)).
Even though the reasons are not clear, our study – strengthened by a large sample size – revealed a significantly frequent occurrence of stroke, specifically cerebral infarctions in DLB patients.
Furthermore, examination of the correlation coefficients between HRQOL and indices of stroke severity revealed a progressive decrease from the physical (rho = 0.77, p < 0.00001) to the spiritual domain (rho = 0.01, p = 0.893, Table 4, Figures 3A and 3B).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com