Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
Patients were then observed for adverse effects, and at days 14, 21 and 2, 4, 8 and 12 months returned for assessment and to allow evaluation of antibody or T cell specific responses to PSA.
At the 10-year follow up (2004-2008), 881 women returned for assessment (82.1 % retention rate).
Four months post partum, at a mean (SD) age of 121 (5) days, 350 children (92%) returned for assessment.
When dropouts were excluded from any assessment in the primary studies (for example, those who never returned for assessment after randomization), they were considered non-responders.
When dropouts were excluded for efficacy assessment in any individual RCT (e.g. subjects who never returned for assessment after randomization), they were considered as non-responders.
Similarly, there were no significant differences between the proportion of older and middle-aged women who returned for assessment at month 6 or month 18, (P = 0.948 and 0.467, respectively).
Similar(53)
After screening and baseline evaluations, patients returned for assessments every 4 weeks until the Week 12 visit.
The structured care group was followed up at the Diabetes Centre by the specialist team using a predefined protocol, whereas the usual care group was managed in their original clinic but returned for assessments at 2 years.
The study was conducted from August 2001 to March 2002, with participants with diabetes returning for assessment of diabetes complications in March-May 2002. March-May 2002
If patients fail to return for assessment to the attending practice, they are contacted by phone and asked whether they want to continue with the study.
All 148 participants completed the baseline assessment; 79.05% (48% male) of these (n = 117) returned for posttreatment assessment; of these, 73.50% (43% male) (n = 87) completed the first follow-up assessment; finally, of those who completed the first follow-up, 79.31% (43% male) (n = 69) returned for the second follow-up session.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com