Sentence examples for return to household from inspiring English sources

The QAS differentiates between the categories (A) return to work [full; partly; no; not applicable], (B) return to household duties [full, partly, no] and (C) return to leisure activities [full, partly, no].

However, continual significant decreases in capital costs faced by households for installing systems after 27 October 2010 and increasing prices for grid electricity mean that while the payback period for installing domestic solar panels may have increased somewhat, the long-term rate of return to households on a typical 1.5-kW system has in fact increased over time.

The problem is, if revenues are split 100 ways to appease each special interest, there will be none left to return to households to defuse the political backlash against a carbon price.

In South Africa, women tend to migrate shorter distances to informal settlement areas and regional towns, and retain ties to rural homes, while men tend to migrate longer distances to urban areas, and are less likely to return to households of origin [12], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31].

An option exists to resolve the issues of difficulties raised by having to return to households with test results done after the initial visit.

Differences in the returns to household mobile characteristics are found to be the primary explanation of the welfare differences.

The allocation of fiscal transfers to districts is found to be based on "needs" defined as low returns to household mobile endowments.

This paper presents empirical evidences on the types of off-farm employment opportunities available to rural farm households in Southwest Nigeria, returns to household labour supply use within the rural farm and non-farm sectors, and implications of the labour use patterns on farm household production efficiency in the study area.

A plausible explanation for this is the fact that rates of returns to household labour use in most of the available rural non-farm activities is much lower than what obtains from labour supply/investment in tree cropping (mostly cash crops) and livestock production (Shittu, [2011]).

One hundred percent of the revenue raised from a fee on carbon could be returned to households to offset higher production costs passed on to consumers.

If they had structured it so all the revenue was returned to households, the political will would have made it impossible to repeal it".