It is interesting that, while for other laparoscopic procedures quality of life comparisons exist, for comparison of LA vs. OA in general only two studies could be retrieved evaluating this fact.
The entire drug safety enterprise has a need to search, retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize scientific evidence more efficiently.
To explore science as a process, students need to be information literate; that is, they must be able to locate, retrieve, evaluate, and effectively use information, while using appropriate technologies (Warnken, 2004; Association of College and Research Libraries [ACRL], 2006; Mahaffy, 2006).
From all selected studies, the full-text articles were retrieved and evaluated to assess whether they met the inclusion criteria.
At 4 and 12 weeks, implants were retrieved and evaluated by microcomputed tomography (microCT) and histological scoring analysis.
If the study abstract was considered eligible, the full text of the study was retrieved and evaluated to determine if the study was eligible for inclusion.
At 4 and 12 weeks post implantation, the scaffolds were retrieved and evaluated for extent of degradation by measuring the residual weight of the scaffolds, thermal properties (DSC), and morphology (SEM) whereas the polymer was analyzed for both its composition (1H NMR) and molecular weight (GPC).
These studies were retrieved and evaluated by two independent reviewers (LBB and PB).
The top alignments with bit scores >40 were retrieved and evaluated.
In total, liver biopsies from 228 infected patients in the DITTO-HCV trial were retrieved and evaluated.
