Sentence examples for retrieval consisting of from inspiring English sources

Antigen retrieval, consisting of microwave processing at 750 W and 150 W for 15 minutes each and pressure cooking in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 7.3), was applied.

In particular, they referred to a classical model of lexical retrieval consisting of three stages (cf. [ 72]): lexical access, recognition, and integration.

As explained in the 'Task' section, we lack a gold standard data set for care episode retrieval, consisting of relevant documents per query according to judgements by human experts.

Heat-induced epitope retrieval consisting of 20-min microwave treatment (10 min at high power and 10 min at low power) in pH 6.0 citrate buffer was necessary for all markers, except HER2.

Antigen retrieval consisted of treatment of paraffin sections three times for 5 min each with 0.01M citrate buffer in a microwave oven, followed by a 20 min cool-down period before proceeding to the next step.

Stimulus material during retrieval consisted of four vertical circle pairs (for a detailed description of the experiment, please see Materials and methods, Material and task and Materials and methods, Procedure ).

Antigen retrieval consisted of pressure cooking for 3 min in Tris-EDTA (pH 9) for VEGF, Ki-67 and CD34, and 60°C waterbath overnight in 1 m M Tris-EDTA (pH 9) for HIF-1 α and HIF-2 α.

BrdU IHC was performed as described above with the following modifications: endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3% H2O2/Methanol for 10 minutes and antigen retrieval consisted of trypsin digestion (1 mg/ml trypsin for 10 min at room temperature), followed by incubation in 2.5 M HCl for 10 min at 37°C.

For heat-induced epitope retrieval, deparaffinised sections were soaked in Target Retrieval Solution consisting of 10 m M Tris and 1 m M EDTA (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), and treated at 95°C for 30 min in a microwave oven.

In this retrieval experiment, the specimen image is shown in Figure 9a, with the corresponding retrieval results consisting of the most similar images presented in Figure 9b.

The top 20 retrieval results, consisting of the most similar images, are shown in Figure 10b.