Sentence examples for retrieval account from inspiring English sources

Under a cue-based retrieval account of language comprehension, linguistic dependency resolution (e.g., retrieving antecedents) is subject to interference from other information in the sentence, especially information that occurs between the words that form the dependency (e.g., between the antecedent and the retrieval site).

Explored is how the episodic retrieval account of negative priming, with its reliance on memory mechanisms, could account for the DID findings.

A parsimonious episodic retrieval account (as provided by the SAM model) explains both short- and long-term priming in one mechanism.

The primary dichotomy (Thomson and Milliken, 2013) appears to be between the feature-weighting account of intertrial priming and the episodic retrieval account.

Further simulations with SAM revealed a prediction unique to the episodic retrieval account: as learning occurs on each presentation, more associated traces are formed for frequent than for infrequent items.

In contrast to the independent feature weighting view, the episodic retrieval account assumes that every trial is stored as a bound episodic memory, and that automatic retrieval of these memories affects performance on the current trial.

These effects are thus explained within both hybrid and episodic retrieval accounts by reference to retrieval of past trial episodes.

In the present study, the retrieval takes into account the variable noise of the tropospheric corrected spectra.

This algorithm takes both data redistribution costs and data retrieval costs into account and combines these two problems into a single problem.

To compensate for different rates of development caused by temperature differences between streams, we estimated the time when 50% hatching should have occurred for retrieval, taking into account local temperature regimes.

This indicates a much higher proteolytic vulnerability of the targeting sequence when attached to the C-terminus of the heavy chain and suggests that this selective loss of the ER retrieval motif probably accounts for the inefficient intracellular retention of 2F5-KDEL (Fig. 1B).