Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Results for retention were less clear; although one study found improvements in retention one year post-implementation [ 20], another [ 22] found that shared governance had no effect.
Similar(59)
For Severi 2011 1, the primary outcome was completed follow-up at 30 weeks from randomisation, Severi 2011 2 used return of specimens one month after a telephone call, Avenell 2004 used retention at one year measured by questionnaire return but also reported retention at four and eight months.
The buprenorphine program in this study demonstrated a high level of retention over one year and beyond with a strict focus on abstinence and work adaptation.
The primary outcomes of interest were treatment retention at one year and achieving ≥ 6 "opioid negative" months.
Using multivariate analysis, recent criminal charges was the only factor significantly associated with treatment retention at one year and achieving ≥ 6 opioid-negative months.
For example, a large RCT with over 2,311 subjects failed to detect a relationship between BMI, sex, ethnicity, and retention at one year follow up [ 6].
Range of motion was the only common outcome parameter; a meta-analysis showed a difference in range of motion and reproduction angle favouring posterior stabilized designs over PCL retention designs one year postoperatively.
The predicted tensile strength retentions for one year of ageing of vinylester/glass at 30 °C, 50 °C and 60 °C using Arrhenius rate model were 59%, 48%and43%3% respectively.
A German study [ 18] observed that 50% of patients continued their treatment for more than 7 years, with a 65% retention rate at one year.
Another study in Spain reported similar results, with a 60% retention rate at one year and 38% at 3 years [ 25].
Low retention rates at one year (25 50% in certain studies) were reported in a 2001 review by Magura et al. [ 23], who identified the restrictive and coercive nature of specific treatment regimens as factors associated with low retention rates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com