Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The statistical evaluation of variables such as material, storage and time as well as interactions of these variables revealed that storage time was significant regarding retention force (Table 2).
Similar(59)
An increased amount of protrusion also did not cause higher retention forces (Table 1), indicating that its retentive capacities are independent of mandibular protrusion for the protrusive range studied.
When storage time only was compared there was a significant increase in retention force with time (Table 5).
The statistical analysis revealed that the most important factor affecting the retention force was storage time (Tables 2 and 5).
The use of two conical magnets increased retention slightly, but the median retention force remained the same (3.41 N).
To disengage fixture mount from implant, the open-ended spanner was used to break the retention force of the fixture mount retention screw.
The stem drilling was the only significant factor influencing the retention force (p = 0.020).
Drilling reduces the retention force, and difference in bone apposition does not confound this result.
Its retention force in the experimental setting was measured to be 1.24 N.
We correlated the retention force with the amount of bone apposition.
We hypothesized that increased bone apposition would increase the retention force of the implant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com