Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Figure 4 Developmental retardation rate of zebrafish embryos in the first 60 hpf.
Developmental retardation rate is given as percentage of the observed retardations divided by the total possible ones at appropriate time points.
In contrast, only a low retardation rate was observed with the single-stranded attI1 bottom fragments (figure 4B).
Similar(57)
The HAMD Psychomotor Retardation correlations stand out across a large set of phones, with positive individual correlations indicating a significant lengthening of these phones with higher Psychomotor Retardation rating.
Similar to the phone rate results, the pseudo-syllable speaking rate shows significant correlation with the HAMD Psychomotor Retardation (-0.37) and total (-0.26), and the pseudo-syllable articulation rate shows highly significant correlation with the Psychomotor Retardation rating (-0.41).
The articulation rate measure did not show the same correlation with HAMD total, but did show a stronger relationship with the Psychomotor Retardation rating than the more general speaking rate.
Figure 8 A comparison between the individual phone length correlations of Figure 3 (circle marker) and the individual phone length correlations when all samples showing a nonzero Psychomotor Retardation rating are removed from the calculation (cross marker).
(a) The Salpetrière Retardation Rating Scale (SRRS).
Bonin-Guillaume et al. designed the Retardation Rating Scale (RRS) to evaluate the global aspect of PMR in the geriatric population [ 27].
Three scales have been specifically designed to assess PMR in depression, each addressing different objectives: the Salpetrière Retardation Rating Scale (SRRS), the CORE index of melancholia, and the Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale (MARS) [ 19– 219.
The most significant correlations for both the speaking and articulation rate measures are found with the Psychomotor Retardation ratings.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com