Exact(6)
Our systematic research in animals indicated that airway reflexes have similar resuscitation potential as gasping respiration.
Such close similarity of AspR with gasping suggests their similar resuscitation potential, resembling autoresuscitation of human infants by gasping [ 4, 5, 7].
The results of our systematic study indicated, that airway reflexes and particularly the AspR have similar resuscitation potential in animals as autoresuscitation by gasping.
The resuscitation potential of AspR was proved by termination of progressive hypotension and atrio-ventricular (A-V) blockade in a cat, during gasping stage caused by severe asphyxia, indicated on Figure 3, analyzed later more in detail.
Practical application of powerful resuscitation potential of AspR in animals [ 19, 31, 35], and various revitalisation effects of its voluntary surrogate, represented by sniff in humans [ 40], seem to be very perspective.
Such approved similarity of gasp-like AspR in cats and other animals, with the gasping in infants suggests also similar resuscitation potential for AspR in cats and other animals, than gasping in human infants.
Similar(54)
Research in neonatal resuscitation poses some potential ethical obstacles, but national and international regulations and guidelines are available to assist investigators in study design.
If translated to the clinical setting, microcirculatory perfusion may represent a useful endpoint of resuscitation and a potential therapeutic target.
However, many clinicians use certain triggers to start, but are unaware of triggers to stop fluid resuscitation, increasing the potential for fluid overload.
Furthermore, at least two randomized, controlled trials have explored lactate clearance as a potential resuscitation goal for septic shock patients with encouraging results [5, 6].
We found that interviewees described potential resuscitation scenarios which clustered into 6 types: trauma, cardiac, overdose, major hemorrhage, sepsis and respiratory failure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com