resumed again

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "resumed again" is not considered correct in standard written English due to redundancy.
You can use it when you want to emphasize the act of starting something that was previously interrupted, but it's better to avoid the redundancy. Example: "After the break, the meeting resumed again, discussing the next steps."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

Bilateral relations were resumed again soon after.

The New York Times

After about five minutes it resumed again.

The Guardian

But they resumed again soon after he resigned.

The New York Times - Arts

After an elapsed delay of about 10 minutes, play resumed, again without explanation to spectators.

The New York Times

The search was called off at 11pm on Monday but resumed again on Tuesday morning.

The Guardian

In 1957 negotiations in London resumed, again with Lee on the delegation.

Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

And then the cycle resumes again.

The New York Times

The inquiry should be resuming again shortly.

The Guardian

Courses will resume again during the second fall term.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The stalled 2001 Doha trade talks resume (again) this week.

The Guardian

Attempt to resume again?" "A software issue, yes," Hernandez said.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "resumed again" in formal writing. The word "resumed" already implies that an action has started again, making "again" redundant. Opt for "resumed" for conciseness.

Common error

Don't add extra words to emphasize that something restarted. Using "resumed" is enough. For example, instead of saying "The meeting resumed again after the break", simply say "The meeting resumed after the break."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "resumed again" functions as a verbal phrase indicating the recommencement of an activity or process. It often appears within clauses to describe events or actions that have been restarted after an interruption. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, it is redundant.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

24%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6%

Academia

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "resumed again" is frequently used across various contexts, including news and scientific articles, it's grammatically redundant. The word "resumed" inherently means to start again, making the addition of "again" unnecessary and less preferable in formal writing. As Ludwig AI suggests, using "resumed" alone, or opting for alternatives like "started again" or "recommenced", provides clearer and more concise communication. Therefore, while its usage is common, it is not considered best practice in formal or academic writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Resumed

Removes the redundant "again", resulting in a grammatically correct and concise phrase.

Started again

Replaces "resumed" with "started" while keeping "again" for emphasis.

Began again

Similar to "started again", but uses "began" as a synonym.

Recommenced

Uses a more formal synonym for "resumed".

Took up again

Implies a renewed interest or engagement in something.

Picked up again

Indicates a return to an activity, often after a pause.

Was restarted

Uses a passive construction to indicate the action of resuming.

Reinitiated

A more formal synonym for "resumed", suggesting a formal beginning.

Continued

Suggests that something is now going on without emphasis on interruption.

Reactivated

Implies a restoration to a functional state.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "resumed again"?

While commonly used, "resumed again" is considered grammatically redundant. The term "resumed" already implies that something is starting "again". It is more concise to simply use "resumed".

What can I say instead of "resumed again"?

Alternatives include "resumed", "started again", or "recommenced" depending on the level of formality you want to convey.

Which is correct, "resumed again" or "resumed"?

"Resumed" is the more grammatically correct and concise option. "Resumed again" includes unnecessary repetition, making it less preferable in formal writing.

What is the difference between "resumed" and "started again"?

"Resumed" typically implies a continuation of something that was previously interrupted, while "started again" can refer to something completely new or a fresh beginning. Semantically they are very close and often interchangeable.