results were consistent with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "results were consistent with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing findings that align or agree with a particular theory, hypothesis, or previous research. Example: "The results were consistent with previous studies, indicating a strong correlation between the two variables."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The results were consistent with arsenic poisoning.

The New York Times - Books

The results were consistent with this idea.

Nature

These results were consistent with those of some previous studies.

Nature

The results were consistent with NS1 protein over-expression.

Nature

The in vitro results were consistent with the field results.

Nature

These results were consistent with the findings in mammalian cells.

Nature

Analysts said that the results were consistent with their expectations.

The New York Times

The results were consistent with LeT.

Behavioural Processes

The results were consistent with theoretical expectations.

Journal of Destination Marketing & Management

Results were consistent with our hypothesis.

Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Every time, with every study, his results were consistent with his radical idea.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "results were consistent with", clearly specify what the results are consistent with. This provides context and strengthens the statement's impact. For instance, "The results were consistent with previous studies, indicating a strong correlation between the two variables."

Common error

Avoid using "results were consistent with" without specifying the expected outcome, hypothesis, or prior research. This can lead to ambiguity. Instead of saying "The results were consistent with expectations", clarify by stating "The results were consistent with our initial hypothesis that increased exercise leads to lower blood pressure."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "results were consistent with" functions as a statement of agreement or alignment between observed outcomes and a pre-existing expectation, hypothesis, or set of data. As seen in Ludwig, this phrase is frequently used to express that the outcomes of a study or experiment supported the initial predictions or aligned with established knowledge.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

22%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "results were consistent with" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to indicate that outcomes align with expectations, previous findings, or established theories. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Primarily found in scientific, academic, and news contexts, this phrase conveys validation and support for existing knowledge. While generally formal, its versatility allows use in various settings, provided clarity and context are maintained.

For enhanced writing, remember to clearly specify what the "results were consistent with" to ensure your text is clear and impactful. By following this guidance, you can effectively use this phrase to communicate your ideas accurately.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

findings aligned with

Replaces "results" with "findings" and "were consistent with" with "aligned with", suggesting a visual metaphor of alignment rather than consistency.

outcomes corroborated

Substitutes "results" with "outcomes" and "were consistent with" with "corroborated", emphasizing confirmation and support of previous findings.

data supported

Uses "data" instead of "results" and replaces "were consistent with" with "supported", focusing on the supportive nature of the data.

evidence confirmed

Replaces "results" with "evidence" and "were consistent with" with "confirmed", highlighting the confirmation aspect of the evidence.

observations matched

Employs "observations" instead of "results" and "matched" in place of "were consistent with", indicating a direct correspondence between observations and expectations.

conclusions agreed with

Uses "conclusions" to replace "results" and "agreed with" to replace "were consistent with", suggesting agreement and harmony with established conclusions.

the results concurred with

Replaces "were consistent with" with "concurred with", which implies agreement and shared opinion.

the findings were in agreement with

Replaces "consistent with" with "in agreement with", emphasizing the aspect of agreement between the findings and something else.

the results harmonized with

Employs a more figurative expression to illustrate results that fall into place with other data sets.

the data comported with

Offers a slightly more formal phrase with near identical meaning, but with a stronger sense of agreement and compliance.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "results were consistent with"?

You can use alternatives like "findings aligned with", "outcomes corroborated", or "data supported" depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to specify what the "results were consistent with"?

Yes, it's best practice to specify what the "results were consistent with" to avoid ambiguity and ensure clarity. Specifying the point of comparison makes your statement more informative and credible.

What does it mean when "results were consistent with" something?

It means that the outcomes or findings of a study or experiment aligned with a particular theory, hypothesis, previous research, or expectation. It suggests that the new data supports or confirms the existing understanding.

Are there contexts where "results were consistent with" is not appropriate?

The phrase is generally appropriate in academic, scientific, and formal writing. However, in more informal contexts, you might opt for simpler language, such as "results matched" or "results agreed with".