Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
The agreement between the QFT and the TST results was poor, with positive result rates of 1.4% vs. 27.5%, respectively.
It is possible that the quality of the NTA results was poor because the utility of the test depends on the ability to blindly pass a catheter into the trachea.
Correlation between the Recurrence Score and the Prosigna assay results was poor (r = 0.08).
In contrast to this, a study conducted by Johnson et al. verified the correlation between KBT and FCM results was poor.
Conclusion The reporting of data related to the applicability of results was poor in published articles of both non-randomised studies and randomised controlled trials and did not differ by study design.
Low, <40; intermediate, between 41 and 60; high, between 61 and 100 The correlation between the Recurrence Score and the Prosigna score results was poor (Fig. 1c; r = 0.08; 95% CI, −0.2 to 0.35; Spearman correlation).
Similar(52)
But its results are poor.
The initial results were poor.
Euronext's third-quarter results were poor.
Neville's early results were poor.
If the results are poor, something terrible happens.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com