Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Significance of heterogeneity of study results was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test, which has somewhat limited sensitivity, and further by the I statistic, which represents the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to between-study heterogeneity (21).
The significance of these results was evaluated using the binomial cumulative distribution function where the probability (pk) of observing at least 226 (or 271) significant chemical-disease (or chemical-disease category) relationships by random chance was determined using the data for 4559 chemicals from CTD and for 204 diseases in GAD.
Similar(58)
Clinical results were evaluated using the AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot scale.
The results were evaluated using the response surface methodology.
18Where appropriate, all results are evaluated using the sample mean of 4.213.
The results are evaluated using the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy.
Results were evaluated using the Student's t-test and Fisher exact test.
The results were evaluated using the response surface methodology with a view to identifying the most suitable operating conditions.
In this study, measurement test methods for membrane properties are presented and important factors impacting the test results are evaluated using the test data.
Clinical results were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot scale [11], which assigns 50 points to function, 40 to pain, and 10 to alignment of the foot.
The results were evaluated using the SmartCycler™ software program.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com