Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(23)
We analyzed the risk factors for recurrence of odontogenic keratocysts and compared our results to published ones.
The accuracy of these models was assessed by comparing predicted results to published measured values taken from planetary gear sets and parallel axis gear set experiments.
Comparing our results to published datasets we conclude that this lower thermocline depth ecology for the Oligo-Miocene is part of an Eocene-to-Pliocene evolution of depth habitat from surface to sub-thermocline for "D".
We compared our results to published data to seacrch for independent external validations.
This study compared results to published literature.
3) Further compare our results to published results in this area based mainly on numerical methods.
Similar(37)
Chemistry Central Journal is waiting for your results to publish.
It's a big day when you have enough results to publish a paper.
Even though his research is commercially driven, he has freedom to pursue unexpected results, to publish, and to maintain contacts with academic colleagues.
They communicate their test results to the editor, who then chooses which of the two results to publish.
Far less attention is paid to the bias that occurs when some results from a study are published, but the choice of which results to publish produces bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com