Sentence examples for results cost from inspiring English sources
Two poor results cost them qualification and it was time to move on.
The former manager has worked tirelessly on improving the academy and training-ground facilities but results cost him support and ultimately his job.
To Restate Results Cost Of NYMEX Seat Hits $1M Goldman Buys Specialist Walter N. Frank State Farm Loses S&P's AAA Rating Ford Warns 13,000 Of Credit Fraud Danger Fitch Cuts Ratings For Banks, Brokerages, Warns Of More BA May Post Biggest Year Loss; SAS, Others Better.
If a program is developed without paying any intention to energy may mislead toward bad results Cost (in terms of man power) Lots of efforts are required to develop energy efficient system, which required a lot of programming skills and intention Workload When workload is known, DVFS works well, but when workload is unknown then response is non-trivial.
In this effort, rather than focusing on the question of how much grantees spend on overhead, they are asking the much more important question, "What do results cost?" To answer this question, however, nonprofits will need even greater investments in overhead so that they can track and communicate their performance.
Results: cost per additional QALY was £297,000.
For example, 24 hours of Kaplan tutoring and five exams, along with an analysis of results, costs $3,389.
Understanding the results costs extra.
Owing to the uncertainty around results, cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will be used, with bootstrapping of skewed results.
Technical characteristics included the following: perspective; time horizon; methodology/modelling; search strategy for parameters; costs; effectiveness measures; discounting; assumptions and biases; results, cost-effectiveness ratio, endpoints; sensitivity analysis; generalizability; strengths and limitations; conclusions; implications and feasibility; and recommendations.
To be able to interpret results, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves are presented, expressing the probability that an intervention is considered cost-effective (y-axis) depending on the willingness to pay (WTP) for an additional QALY (x-axis).
