Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
The resulting items were things you wouldn't look at twice, like laminate tabletops with plastic edges.
The resulting items were polytomously coded (for further information, refer to Koppelt 2011 and Scherer 2012).
Specifically, users need to see resulting items in the hierarchical context of their ancestors, descendants, and siblings within the file hierarchy, and understand the granularity of the item within that hierarchy (Demian and Balatsoukas 2012).
After further revision, the same focus groups reevaluated the resulting items for content validity.
Together, then, the resulting items and their method of development add construct, content and face validity to the modified tool.
This iterative process of interpretation continued until the resulting items optimally represented their dimensions, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Similar(50)
The resulting item bank contains 77 items representing a wide range of levels of functional status.
The resulting item pool was first scrutinized by the expert panel for comprehensiveness, relevance and comprehensibility.
The resulting item pool was pretested in 20 patients with rheumatic diseases.
Finally, the resulting item set was analysed to determine its conformity to the Rasch model.
Unfortunately, this may eliminate items that contribute to the sensitivity and content validity of the resulting item banks.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com