The part of a sentence "resulting from multiplying" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the outcome of a mathematical multiplication operation. For example: "The resulting number from multiplying 6 and 8 is 48."
where: χ i [fi-1, f i ]: the characteristic function of the interval [fi-1, f i ], (p i )i∈[1,K]: an N th order polynomials series, (f i )i∈[1,K]: the discontinuity points resulting from multiplying each p i by a χ i and n(f): the additive corrupting noise.
In addition, the cross-product matrix resulting from multiplying the P-matrix by its transpose, results in a square and symmetric matrix, PTP, of dimension equal to 333 (i.e. the number of TFs).
From this relation is derived the algebraic use of the term square, which denotes the product that results from multiplying any algebraic expression by itself.
The allowable transformations of length in inches are those that preserve ratios all and only those that result from multiplying every length by a constant.
If the odds of Hj relative to Hk are defined as ratio of their probabilities, then from the Ratio Formula it follows that, in a case in which change in degrees of belief results from conditionalizing on E, the final odds (Pf(Hj)/Pf Hk)) result from multiplying the initial odds (Pi(Hj)/Pi Hk)) by the likelihood ratio (Pi(E/Hj)/Pi(E/Hk)).
In addition to the existing measures and the social network measure, we calculated, a number of measures that did not fit any the above outlined classes, namely (Table 1, ID 20) A measure that results from multiplying a journal's Impact Factor with its PageRank, described in Bollen (2006) [15].
Costs per patient resulted from multiplying the unit costs by the frequencies of resources used for the individual patient (unit costs × volumes of use).
Costs per patient resulted from multiplying the mean prices (from the cost catalogue) by the frequencies and dosages of resources used for the individual patients derived from the assessed data.
The effective probability of infection (EPI) for each risk stratum resulted from multiplying the same between herd prevalence (P*H) of PRRSV obtained from the cross-sectional study with the respective AR.
The influence of criteria weights on the overall value estimate of interventions was explored by calculating the overall value (V) that would result from multiplying the normalized criteria weights (w i ) obtained in this study with performance scores (v i ) obtained in a previous study [ 12].
The IRS score results from multiplying the area-score with the intensity of immunoreactivity, as described elsewhere [ 25].
