resulted with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "resulted with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "resulted in," which is used to indicate the outcome or consequence of an action or event. Example: "The heavy rain resulted in flooding throughout the city."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The decision likely resulted with one of the CalMail architects leaving the university for greener pastures.

University of California, Berkeley

Several high-level resignations have resulted, with the most notable casualty being Prime Minister Robert Fico.

The Washington Post

Reviews of global datasets resulted with a gap of around 20%8,9,10.

Nature

The silage maize 2013 resulted with an average organic to non-organic yield gap of 27%.

Nature

A double squeeze would have resulted, with West guarding clubs, East guarding spades, and diamonds as the anchor suit.

The New York Times - Arts

Lower amounts of chaptalization resulted in the presence of green apple while higher amounts resulted with baked sugar aromatics.

Cornell University

This review began with the evaulation of approximately 14,000 citations and resulted with a. summary of about 40 papers.

Cornell University

But the global boom that resulted, with fast growth and low inflation, cannot be reproduced.

The New York Times

Their activities and associated block movements have resulted with tilting processes.

Geomorphology

A trend toward linear increases in wither and hip height growth resulted with increasing CP ME.

Journal of Dairy Science

This sensitivity resulted with an increase in the number of bicoherence peaks.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "resulted in" instead of "resulted with" to ensure grammatical correctness. "Resulted in" is the standard and accepted form for expressing that something led to a particular outcome.

Common error

Avoid using "resulted with" due to its grammatical incorrectness. The correct preposition to use after "resulted" when indicating a consequence or outcome is "in", not "with". Using "with" can confuse readers and make your writing appear unprofessional. Replace it with "resulted in", "led to", or "caused".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "resulted with" functions as a verb phrase attempting to connect an action with its consequence. However, Ludwig AI indicates it is grammatically incorrect and should be replaced with "resulted in".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

32%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Wiki

9%

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "resulted with" is relatively common across diverse sources, it's crucial to acknowledge that it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI advises that the correct and standard form is "resulted in". This analysis underscores the importance of using precise language, especially in formal contexts. Although the intended meaning is often clear, employing the accurate phrase enhances clarity and credibility. Remember to use alternatives like "led to" or "caused" for better accuracy and professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resulted in

Corrects the preposition, using the standard and grammatically accepted form.

led to

Replaces "resulted with" with a more direct causal verb, indicating a clear cause-and-effect relationship.

caused

Simplifies the phrasing to a single, strong verb emphasizing direct causation.

brought about

Indicates a more active role in producing the outcome.

gave rise to

Suggests a more gradual or indirect causal link.

generated

Emphasizes the creation or production of something as a result.

produced

Similar to "generated", but can imply a more tangible output.

precipitated

Suggests a sudden or hastened outcome.

contributed to

Indicates a partial cause, rather than a sole cause.

had as a consequence

Formal and emphatic way of expressing the outcome of something.

FAQs

Is "resulted with" grammatically correct?

No, "resulted with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "resulted in".

What is the difference between "resulted in" and "resulted with"?

"Resulted in" is the grammatically correct phrase to use when indicating that something led to a specific outcome or consequence. "Resulted with" is not a recognized or accepted phrase in standard English.

What can I use instead of "resulted with"?

Instead of "resulted with", you can use alternatives such as "resulted in", "led to", or "caused".

How do I use "resulted in" correctly in a sentence?

Use "resulted in" to show that an action or event produced a specific outcome. For example: "The heavy rain "resulted in" flooding."