resulted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "resulted for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct phrase would be "resulted in." Example: "The changes in policy resulted in a significant increase in productivity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This resulted, for the first time, in outbreaks of terrorism.

Encyclopedia Britannica

An opening gross of £8,500 resulted, for a woeful site average of £80.

The Guardian - Film

(The resignations and shuffling of Mubarak's cabinet this past weekend resulted, for Hawass, in his promotion).

The New Yorker

A yellow card resulted for the tackle but the outcome could be a multiple citing.

The Guardian - Sport

No significant effects resulted for de facto knowledge.

Learning and Instruction

What resulted for several hours was a remarkably efficient, heavy rain-generating machine.

The Washington Post

Many tortuous conclusions resulted, for example calling on Britain to recognise the Soviet-imposed government of Afghanistan.

The Guardian

The Rev Kit Gunasekera returned from holiday with a yes, which has resulted, for me, in two outcomes.

The Guardian - Opinion

This resulted, for example, in 12 100% bleaching at the Houtman Abrolhos Islands29,35 and 79 92% at Ningaloo Reef12.

Nature

A large compressive residual stress resulted for 1600 pulses cm�� 2.

Surface and Coatings Technology

In these measurements a detection limit of 3 nM is resulted for both compounds.

Electrochimica Acta

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "resulted in" instead of "resulted for". This ensures grammatical correctness and avoids potential misinterpretation.

Common error

The common mistake is using "for" instead of "in" after "resulted". Remember that "resulted" needs "in" to correctly link the cause with its effect. For example, say "The experiment resulted in a discovery" not "The experiment resulted for a discovery".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "resulted for" functions incorrectly as a causal connector. It attempts to link a cause with a consequence, but it doesn't follow standard English grammar. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the correct form is "resulted in."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

40%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Academia

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "resulted for" appears frequently in various sources, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct form is "resulted in". The intended purpose is to show a cause-and-effect relationship, but the incorrect usage detracts from clarity and precision. Always opt for alternatives like "led to", "caused", or "brought about" to ensure grammatical accuracy and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resulted in

This is the grammatically correct form of "resulted", indicating a direct consequence.

led to

Focuses on the action that caused a specific outcome, replacing the entire phrase.

gave rise to

Emphasizes the beginning or creation of something as a result of an action.

brought about

Highlights the act of causing something to happen or exist.

caused

A more direct and simpler way to indicate causation.

produced

Suggests the creation or generation of something tangible or measurable.

created

Indicates that something new has been made or developed.

stemmed from

Focuses on the origin or source of the result, emphasizing the starting point.

arose from

Similar to 'stemmed from', but can also imply a more spontaneous or unexpected development.

precipitated

Highlights that something led to an abrupt and sudden outcome.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "resulted" in a sentence?

The correct phrasing is "resulted in", which indicates that something caused a specific outcome. For example: "The new policy "resulted in" increased efficiency."

Is "resulted for" grammatically correct?

No, "resulted for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is ""resulted in"".

What can I use instead of "resulted for"?

Alternatives include "led to", "caused", or "brought about", depending on the context you wish to convey.

What is the difference between "resulted in" and "resulted from"?

"Resulted in" indicates the outcome or consequence, while "resulted from" indicates the origin or cause. For example: "The fire resulted in damage" (outcome) versus "The damage resulted from the fire" (cause).