resulted after

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "resulted after" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is typically used incorrectly, as "resulted" implies a cause-and-effect relationship that does not align with "after," which suggests a sequence of events. Example: "The changes in policy resulted after the survey was conducted" should be rephrased for clarity.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A mistrial resulted, after which the government added the more serious charge of treason.

The New York Times

"What was the cause?" "Pneumonia was listed as the official cause, although that was actually a complication that resulted after her hospitalization.

The New York Times - Magazine

The rocket fire into Israel that resulted after its withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 has also taken its toll on Haredi views.

The New York Times

American planners envisioned postwar reconstruction in terms of Wilsonian internationalism but were determined to avoid the mistakes that resulted after 1918 in inflation, tariffs, debts, and reparations.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In 1963 six people died and more than $6 million in property damage resulted after the earthen dam on Spaulding Pond collapsed, sending a wall of water and debris through downtown Norwich.

The New York Times

It follows an intense political debate that resulted after the AFP deputy commissioner for national security, Peter Drennan, gave details of Abdellatif's red notice to Senate estimates on 30 May.

The Guardian

Industry competitors, both large and small, disagreed, with some recalling the earlier consent decree that resulted after they first brought their complaints to the Justice Department nearly a decade ago.

The New York Times

And he has served a yearlong suspension for violating the N.F.L.'s substance-abuse policy, a punishment that resulted after he was charged with driving under the influence while already suspended.

The New York Times - Sports

If no clear leader emerges, the US may have to pull out all its troops – a move it opposes after the chaos that resulted after doing just that in Iraq only three years ago.

The Guardian

The commission rebutted claims at the time by city officials and residents of Washington Heights that Con Ed had neglected Upper Manhattan, with its minority and low-income population, before the 19-hour blackout that resulted after feeder cables failed.

The New York Times

At the same time, internal party bickering resulted after Mr. Panday passed over Attorney General Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj for the post of acting prime minister, even though Mr. Maharaj was deputy party leader.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace the phrase "resulted after" with more precise alternatives like "resulted from" or "followed after" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "resulted after" when you mean "resulted from". "Resulted" indicates a cause-and-effect relationship, while "after" simply indicates sequence. Using the correct preposition clarifies the relationship you intend to express.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "resulted after" functions as part of a clause aiming to describe a sequence of events and their consequences. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Examples from Ludwig AI show it attempts to link an outcome with a subsequent action, though imprecisely.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

56%

News & Media

37%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "resulted after" appears frequently across various sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The phrase attempts to link a consequence with a subsequent event, but it should be replaced with more precise alternatives such as "resulted from" (to indicate causation) or "followed after" (to indicate sequence). Its prevalence in science and news media does not validate its use; rather, writers should aim for grammatical accuracy in all contexts to ensure clarity. Therefore, avoid using this phrase in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resulted from

Indicates direct causation, focusing on the cause that led to a specific outcome, rather than the timing.

followed after

Emphasizes the sequence of events, highlighting what happened subsequently rather than a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

came about because of

Specifies the origin or reason for something happening, stressing the conditions or factors that made it possible.

was a consequence of

Highlights the outcome as an effect of a preceding cause, often implying a logical or natural progression.

occurred subsequent to

Focuses on the timing of the event, indicating that it happened after a specific prior event.

arose from

Indicates that something originated or emerged from a particular source or situation.

stemmed from

Suggests a gradual development or origin from a root cause, emphasizing the evolutionary aspect of the outcome.

was triggered by

Highlights the initial event that set off a chain of reactions, leading to the outcome.

ensued after

Stresses the immediate aftermath or what naturally followed a particular event, often implying a direct connection.

developed following

Indicates a process or evolution that happened in the period after something else.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically sound alternative to "resulted after"?

The phrase "resulted after" is generally considered incorrect. More appropriate alternatives include "resulted from" (indicating cause) or "followed after" (indicating sequence).

How does "resulted from" differ in meaning from "resulted after"?

"Resulted from" indicates a direct cause-and-effect relationship, whereas "resulted after" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't clearly express either causation or sequence. Using "resulted from" correctly shows that something was caused by a specific event.

When is it appropriate to use "followed after" instead of "resulted after"?

Use "followed after" to emphasize that one event occurred in sequence after another, without necessarily implying a direct causal link. The phrase "resulted after" is grammatically incorrect. Using "followed after" correctly shows what happened subsequently.

Is "resulted after" ever considered acceptable in formal writing?

No, "resulted after" is not considered acceptable in formal writing due to its grammatical incorrectness. It is best to use more precise and grammatically correct alternatives like "resulted from" or "followed after" to maintain clarity and credibility.