Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
result to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "result to" is not correct and cannot be used in written English.
The correct phrase is "result in." For example, "The storm resulted in flooding in the low-lying plains."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
We later generalized our result to lossy networks.
Science
For the result to be so unreflective is a shame.
News & Media
"This is not a result to be desired," he said.
News & Media
One-nil is always a difficult result to manage.
News & Media
Lundqvist attributed Monday's result to shot blocking by his teammates.
News & Media
Then he'll upload the result to a class Web site.
News & Media
λ0n and setting the result to zero.
The losses can result to environmental pollution.
Masad likened the result to a stateful serverless platform.
News & Media
Or they just result to ad hominem attacks.
News & Media
That was not an easy result to get.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "result in" instead of "result to" to ensure grammatical correctness. "Result in" indicates what outcome or consequence occurs because of something.
Common error
Avoid using "result to". The correct phrase is "result in". For example, instead of writing "The changes result to confusion", write "The changes result in confusion".
Source & Trust
73%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "result to" functions as a prepositional phrase, but it is grammatically incorrect. Its intended function is to indicate a consequence or outcome, but it fails to do so accurately due to the incorrect preposition. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment.
Frequent in
Science
34%
News & Media
32%
Wiki
13%
Less common in
Formal & Business
7%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "result to" appears frequently across diverse sources, it is fundamentally grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI clearly indicates, the correct usage is "result in". The phrase's intended function is to express causation, yet its grammatical inaccuracy undermines this purpose. Despite its prevalence in various contexts, from science to news media, it should be avoided in all registers. To ensure clarity and correctness, writers should opt for alternatives such as "lead to", "give rise to", or "bring about". Always prioritize grammatical accuracy over common but incorrect usage.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
lead to
Replaces "result to" with a more grammatically sound phrase indicating causation.
give rise to
Offers a formal alternative to "result to", emphasizing the initiation of a consequence.
bring about
Suggests a direct influence, similar to "result to", but grammatically correct.
contribute to
Indicates a partial cause, differing from "result to" which implies a complete cause.
cause
A more direct and concise alternative to "result to", focusing on the action of causing.
produce
Highlights the outcome or output of an action, unlike "result to" which focuses on the consequence.
generate
Implies the creation of something new, unlike "result to" which focuses on the consequence itself.
engender
A more formal term, meaning to cause or give rise to, similar to "result to".
beget
An archaic term suggesting to produce as an effect or offspring, similar to "result to".
spawn
Suggests a rapid or prolific production of something, differing from the general sense of "result to".
FAQs
What's the correct way to use "result" as a verb?
The verb "result" is typically followed by the preposition "in", not "to". For example, "The experiment resulted in a breakthrough" is correct. Using "result to" is grammatically incorrect.
What can I use instead of the incorrect phrase "result to"?
You can use several alternatives such as "lead to", "give rise to", or "bring about" depending on the specific context.
Is "result in" or "result from" more appropriate?
"Result in" means to cause something, while "result from" means to be caused by something. For example, "The rain resulted in flooding" (cause) and "The flooding resulted from the rain" (caused by).
How can I ensure I'm using the correct preposition with "result"?
Double-check the intended meaning. If you want to express what something causes, use "result in". If you want to express the cause of something, use "result from". Avoid using "result to" altogether.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
73%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested