result by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "result by" is not a correct phrase in written English.
You could use the phrase "resulting from" instead. For example, "The children's poor performance on the test was a result of their inadequate preparation."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That Costa Rica score is a result by the way.

The Guardian - Sport

An equivalent UK result, by rule of thumb, is £3.1m.

The Guardian - Film

We may well have a result by 4pm.

The Guardian

Result: by midday, we could have eaten a ranch.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"We sacrificed the result by the spectacle.

BBC

Denote the result by,.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

c Result by fx-decon.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

c Repaired result by ESEII.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

d Result by PT-TFPF.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

Denote the result by.   endw.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

(a) Denoising result by BLS-GSM.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a result, use "resulting from" or "caused by" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "by" to indicate the cause of a result. Instead, use prepositions like "from" or phrases like "due to" to accurately convey causation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "result by" functions as a prepositional phrase often intended to indicate causation or the means by which something is achieved. However, according to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically incorrect and should be replaced with more appropriate alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "result by" is frequently used across diverse contexts, including science and news media, aiming to express causation or the means of achieving a specific outcome. However, Ludwig identifies this phrase as grammatically incorrect, suggesting alternatives like "resulting from", "caused by", or "produced by" for enhanced clarity and precision. While commonly encountered, especially in technical writing, using grammatically correct alternatives is crucial for maintaining credibility and clarity in both formal and informal communication. Despite its frequency, correctness takes precedence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resulting from

Emphasizes causation, indicating that something is a direct consequence or outcome of something else.

caused by

Highlights the direct cause of a particular result or event.

produced by

Focuses on the agent or process that generated the result.

achieved through

Highlights the method or means by which a result was accomplished.

obtained via

Similar to "achieved through", but often used in more technical or formal contexts.

a consequence of

Positions the result as a natural or logical outcome of a preceding event or condition.

due to

Indicates that the result is directly attributable to a specific cause or factor.

attributed to

Assigns the result to a specific source or cause, often with a degree of interpretation or analysis.

brought about by

Stresses the action that led to the result, often implying a deliberate or significant effort.

stemming from

Suggests that the result originates or develops from a particular source or origin.

FAQs

What is the correct way to phrase causation: "result by" or "result of"?

The correct phrasing is "result of". The phrase "result by" is considered grammatically incorrect. For example, "The success was a "result of" hard work" is correct.

What can I use instead of the phrase "result by"?

You can use alternatives like "resulting from", "caused by", or "produced by" depending on the context.

Is it acceptable to use "result by" in formal writing?

No, it is not acceptable. In formal writing, you should use grammatically correct alternatives such as "resulting from" or "due to".

How does "resulting from" differ from "caused by"?

"Resulting from" implies a direct consequence or outcome, while "caused by" emphasizes the agent or event that initiated the result. They are often interchangeable, but "caused by" is more direct in assigning causation.