Considering L q [ f ( t, u n ) ] as a restricted variation so that after taking the classical variational derivative to both sides of (56), we can obtain δ L q [ u n + 1 ] = δ L q [ u n ] + a ¯ ( s ) s α ( 1 − q ) α − 1 δ L q [ u n ], (57).
where is the Lagrange multiplier and denotes restricted variation that is.
The subscript denotes the th approximation, and is considered as a restricted variation [1 4], that is,.
Employing the restricted variation in (2.2) makes it easy to compute the Lagrange multiplier; see [22, 23].
where the function u ˜ n ( x, t ) is considered as a restricted variation function, i.e., δ u ˜ n ( x, t ) = 0.
Finally, we show that restricting variation discovery to coding regions does not adequately describe all common haplotypes or the true haplotype block structure observed when all common variation is used to infer haplotypes.
where λ is a Lagrangian multiplier and u ˜ ( x, t ) is considered as a restricted variation function, i.e., δ u ˜ ( x, t ) = 0. Extremizing the variation of the correction functional (2) leads to the Lagrangian multiplier λ.
The subscript n denotes the nth order approximation, whereas (tilde{u}_{n} x,t)) is considered as a restricted variation [45 47], i.e., (deltatilde{u}_{n} x,t) = 0).
However, Beijing strains exhibit restricted variation in RFLP patterns.
Do epigenetic structures restrict variation?
