Sentence examples for restrictions level from inspiring English sources

*level 1 = no restriction, level 2 = minor restrictions level 3 = severe restrictions level 4 = completely restricted Two functioning indexes were yielded by the first method (Table 3); they both had eigenvalues greater than 1.0 and explained 85.1% of the total variance (of the five functioning variables).

With respect to MI restrictions, level of education turned out to perform similar to age groups.

Interestingly, there was no correlation between the frequency of expression of particular Vβ genes and their restriction level (Fig. 3A).

The restriction level was a reduction to 60% of each animals individually measured FI over baseline.

According to the WHO definition, the qualifiers were graded as follows: Level 0 indicates "no problem" (0 4% limitation or restriction); Level 1 "mild problem" (5 24% limitation or restriction); Level 2 "moderate problem" (25 49% limitation or restriction); Level 3 "severe problem" (50 95% limitation or restriction) and Level 4 "complete problem" (96 100% limitation or restriction).

Logistic regression was used to measure associations with social restriction, while ordinal logistic regression was used to measure associations with a three-category measure of restriction level.

Table 3 describes the ordinal logistic regression model examining associations with a three-category measure of participation restriction level, stratified by CD4 cell counts.

The FFM after AL feeding was not significantly different to the initial pre-restriction level in the same mice for both groups (paired t-tests: P>0.05).

Increased participation restriction level was only marginally significantly associated with moderate or severe pain; however, point estimates for the pain categories suggested a dose response relationship, as did the inclusion of pain as a continuous variable (p-value 0.066).

One subgroup was culled prior to feeding, one subgroup was culled after feeding (n=10 for each restriction level) and one subgroup was provided with AL access to food for 96 hours prior to being culled (n=9).

An overall model examined the associations of increasing participation restriction level with number of impairments and activity limitation scores, testing the hypothesis that impairments may account for some of the associations seen between activity limitations and participation restrictions, but that both of the former would have independent associations with the latter.