Sentence examples for restrictions for study from inspiring English sources

The purpose of the literature review was to both supply a complete collection of the available evidence for the meta-analysis of the trend in the relationship between time since drinking cessation and risk of gastric cancer without restrictions for study type and to give an indication of the quality and level of the current research.

On 22 November 2012, we searched Medline (Pubmed interface) and Web of Science, without date restrictions, for studies of SRH service provision to FSWs in Africa.

We intensively searched the literature, with no taxonomic restrictions, for studies that reported values of m or that we could use to calculate values of m.

On 22 November 2012, we searched Web of Science and MEDLINE, without date restrictions, for studies describing clinical and non-clinical facility-based SRH prevention and care services for FSWs in low- and middle-income countries in Africa.

We searched Medline, HealthStar, EMBASE, Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry, and CINAHL from inception to September 2013 without language restrictions for studies comparing the use of extended/continuous infusions with traditional dosing.

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases (from their commencements to February 2014), with no language restriction, for studies in women of the association between endometrial cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the "sandwich" method.

There were no age restrictions for this study.

Recommendation of reimbursement system-specific restrictions, such as those requiring prescription by a physician specialist, those with authority required for reimbursement, and those with supply/quantity limits, were not considered restrictions for this study, because they did not generally directly relate to the evidence base used in the agency decision-making process.

The evaluation result differed by one quality data level, from unacceptable quality/not reliable to acceptable quality/reliable with restrictions, for five studies [16 20] and by two quality data levels, from unacceptable quality/not reliable to high quality/reliable without restrictions, for two studies [21, 22] (Table 13).

Recommendations regarding ethical restrictions for biomonitoring studies have been developed (Oleskey et al. 2004).

The following search terms were used, each with restrictions for human studies and randomized controlled trials: sepsis and mortality, and severe sepsis and mortality.