Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(59)
The reduced efficacy of the movement restriction regulations can increase transmission of diseases between holdings.
This knowledge is important to determine the efficacy of movement restriction regulations in the short and longer term.
These differences could also have a different impact on holding owners" responses to these movement restriction regulations.
For each of the network features, no effect of the ease of movement restriction regulations (since May 2003) was seen.
They used a more complex network analysis on holding level to determine the efficacy of movement restriction regulations over time.
In addition, the efficacy of movement restriction regulations can be determined in the short and long term [ 11, 12].
Because movement restriction regulations can have different consequences for different holding types, we wanted to know what the effect of these regulations were on the holding type level.
With these analyses, the efficacy of movement restriction regulations was determined in the short (up to one year) and long (up to 3.5 years) term.
Direct distances were steady in time for all holding types and no effect on the ease of movement restriction regulations was seen.
The effect of the movement restriction regulations in this study was assessed by the change in the contact structure between and within holding types.
After the end of the 2001 FMD outbreak in the Netherlands (on June 25th 2001) some of the movement restriction regulations were retained to reduce the number of cattle movements and, consequently, decrease the risk of transmission of infectious diseases in the future.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com