Sentence examples for restrict utility from inspiring English sources

In many cases neighbor opposition laws restrict utility tree-trimming.

Medications have been used to assist in weight loss for almost 80 years, but adverse effects frequently restrict utility.

Compare the difference principle with the principle of restricted utility: Once the social minimum is met, restricted utility does not guarantee that the worse off will benefit in any way from further gains to those better off.

These larger units are of doubtful validity and restricted utility.

The two principles ask less of the better-off than restricted utility asks of the worst-off.

Under restricted utility, in contrast, those living at the minimum will suspect that their interests have been sacrificed to make the better-off better off still.

Limitations with existing formulations of voriconazole including restricted utility in patients with renal dysfunction (intravenous preparation) and the unavailability of an oral suspension in some countries make the administration of crushed tablets desirable in many clinical scenarios.

With restricted utility there is no consistent and continuing tendency toward reciprocity of benefits, for once the social minimum is satisfied the less advantaged are as likely to gain nothing as to benefit from further gains to those better off.

By contrast restricted utility, even if it provides a social minimum, still permits disadvantages and losses to the worst off so that those better off may prosper; any degree of inequality is allowed in the name of maximizing utility so long as it does not violate the social minimum.

He discusses mixed conceptions in Theory, §49, and devotes more attention to them later in Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (§§34 38).. Rawls makes one main argument in favor of the difference principle and several more specific arguments against the principle of restricted utility.

Because of their interests in fully exercising their moral capacities, their sense of self-respect, and their concern for stability, the parties in the original position cannot in good faith rationally affirm restricted utility and the capitalist welfare state when they have the alternative of choosing the difference principle (cf. JF, 128 129).