restored on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "restored on" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to indicate that something has been restored at a specific time or date, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The system was restored on March 5th after the outage."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Iran's government, which came to power by toppling a monarch, is reluctant to see one restored on its doorstep.

The Economist

Officials said they hoped to have service restored on at least one of the two tracks by today's morning rush.

The New York Times

Beautifully restored on DVD and Blu-ray, Heaven's Gate is one of the finest westerns ever made.

The Guardian - Film

Galle was restored on its original site.

The Guardian

He finally had power restored on Monday morning.

The New York Times

Grid power was restored on Monday, the company said.

The New York Times

It was restored on Tuesday, a spokesman, Tashi Phuntsok, said.

The New York Times

My building power was restored on Monday evening.

The Guardian

Ms Kaur challenged the removal and the image was eventually restored on the site.

Independent

Service on the L train between Brooklyn and Manhattan was restored on Thursday.

The New York Times

All the communications disrupted on weekdays between nature and humanity have been restored on Sunday.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating a date, consider using "restored at" followed by the specific time or date for clarity. For example: "Service was restored at 6 AM".

Common error

Avoid using "on" when "at" is more appropriate, especially when specifying the exact time something was restored. Use "at" to denote a specific point in time, and avoid using "on" with "restored".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "restored on" functions as a prepositional phrase, often indicating the time or date when something was brought back to its original condition or functionality. Ludwig AI highlights that while frequently used, it's not considered grammatically ideal.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Science

15%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "restored on" is a frequently used prepositional phrase that indicates when something was brought back to its original state. While common, Ludwig AI suggests the phrase is grammatically incorrect and that alternative phrasings such as "restored at", "restored by", or more specific temporal references might be more appropriate. The phrase is most prevalent in news and media, serving the purpose of informing the audience about the timing of a restoration event. Despite its frequent use, writers should consider more grammatically sound alternatives to enhance clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reinstated on

Emphasizes bringing back something to its original condition on a specific date or time.

recovered on

Focuses on regaining something lost or damaged by a specific time.

re-established on

Highlights the act of setting something up again on a certain date.

returned on

Indicates the act of something being brought back by a specific date.

resumed on

Implies the continuation of something after an interruption, starting again on a specific date.

back on

A shorter, more informal way to say something is functioning again by a specific point.

resurfaced on

Suggests something reappeared or became noticeable again on a date.

recommenced on

Formally indicates starting something again on a specific date.

fixed on

Emphasizes the repair or correction of something by a certain date.

reactivated on

Highlights the return to an active state on a particular date.

FAQs

What is a better way to phrase "restored on"?

While "restored on" is frequently used, it's not the most grammatically sound. Better alternatives include using "restored at", "restored by", or specifying a time, such as, "service was restored at 6 AM".

Is "restored on" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "restored on" is grammatically incorrect. It's recommended to use alternative phrasings like "reinstated on", "recovered on", or simply stating when something was restored.

How can I use "restored" with a date or time correctly?

Instead of "restored on", use "restored at" for a specific time (e.g., "restored at 8:00 AM") or rephrase to use "restored by" or "restored before" to indicate a deadline. You could also say, "the system was restored on Monday" if the "on" is tied to the day itself.

What are some professional synonyms for "restored on" in a business context?

In a professional context, consider using more formal alternatives such as "re-established on" or "returned on" to maintain a higher level of formality and precision.