Exact(1)
Whitehouse et al. [ 21], who purposed a seven-item function WOMAC-SF, studied the responsiveness considering follow-up periods of 3 months and 1 year, and Auw Yang et al. [ 14], who validated the previous seven-item function WOMAC-SF in a different cohort, also studied the responsiveness considering follow-up periods of 3 and 6 months.
Similar(59)
External responsiveness considers whether the changes registered by a measure over time correspond to those expected based on an external reference measure of health [ 28].
Patient-assessed instruments should at least demonstrate validity, reliability and responsiveness before considering them to be useful in clinical practice.
Taken together, these results show that where self-report is used as a measure of maternal responsiveness, teen mothers are no different in responsiveness than adult mothers; however, where physiological and interactional measures of responsiveness are considered, teen mothers are less likely to show heightened or selective responses to infant cries or respond 'attentively' to the infant.
Ten items, including re-test reliability, content validity and responsiveness were considered essential by respondents.
Traditional measurement properties such as re-test reliability, content validity and responsiveness were considered essential (level 1) by respondents.
Responsiveness was considered borderline if PC20 >2 to 16 mg/ml and normal if PC20 >16 mg/ml.
Responsiveness is considered an aspect of validity, in a longitudinal context [ 14].
Responsiveness was considered to have been adequately assessed if hypotheses had been specified and the results corresponded to these hypotheses [ 3].
Responsiveness is considered as an important measurement property of a PROM used for treatment evaluation and needs to be evaluated for the Norwegian version in future research.
Since the mid eighties, responsiveness is considered to be a separate property of health status questionnaires distinct from reliability and validity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com