Sentence examples for responsive evidence from inspiring English sources

These responsive evidence reviews appear to be a promising approach to integrating evidence review into QI processes.

Its networking efforts of note include the multi-stakeholder development of policy briefs and dialogues on mental health and reproductive health; and the current development of a Rapid Response Service designed to assist research-users by pairing them with relevant researchers able to offer tailored and highly responsive evidence summaries.

This paper describes the process and tools used to introduce responsive evidence review into innovation projects; discusses the approaches considered and the search strategies used; and reports on a survey of innovation team members regarding uptake and usefulness of the evidence review programme with suggestions for improvement.

The Responsive Innovation Evidence Review (RIER) project aims to provide a reasonably objective and rapid approach to evidence review to help innovators access evidence that is relevant and tailored to their needs.

The review team developed a systematic approach to responsive innovation evidence review (RIER) that focused on innovator needs in terms of time frame, type of evidence and method of communicating results.

And Chris Mooney wins again: we're talking about personality types who aren't responsive to evidence.

As one insider, who is equally familiar with Wall Street and with Washington, told me: "You want your money managed by people who are responsive to evidence, who care about results and who understand that the world is an uncertain place.

As we have seen in section 6.3 Feminist Perspectives on Values in Science, Anderson makes the distinction by examining the extent to which the values are responsive to evidence— that is, the extent to which they are held non-dogmatically.

For a mental state to count as a belief, it must be at least somewhat responsive to evidence that bears on the truth or falsity of its propositional content; that the facts are contrary to a belief counts against it.

The second specification lowers the standards, but it too is inconsistent with a range of conceptions of the good that flout simple demands of consistency and are not responsive to evidence, such as those oriented around astrology or New Age religions (Nussbaum 2011).

True deliberation and appreciation requires that an individual ' think[s] through alternatives, and this thinking through alternatives needs to be responsive to evidence' .